| Description |
1 online resource (xii, 67 pages) |
| Physical Medium |
polychrome |
| Description |
text file |
| Note |
Title from PDF title page (viewed July 19, 2011). |
| Bibliography |
Includes bibliographical references. |
| Contents |
Summary -- Introduction -- NASA Interagency Collaboration -- Lessons Learned and Best Practices -- Appendixes -- Statement of Task -- Long-Term Sustained Observations for Climate -- Characteristics of NASA's Recent Interagency Collaborations -- Acronyms -- Meeting Agendas -- Biographies of Committee Members and Staff. |
| Summary |
"Through an examination of case studies, agency briefings, and existing reports, and drawing on personal knowledge and direct experience, the Committee on Assessment of Impediments to Interagency Cooperation on Space and Earth Science Missions found that candidate projects for multiagency collaboration in the development and implementation of Earth-observing or space science missions are often intrinsically complex and, therefore costly, and that a multiagency approach to developing these missions typically results in additional complexity and cost. Advocates of collaboration have sometimes underestimated the difficulties and associated costs and risks of dividing responsibility and accountability between two or more partners; they also discount the possibility that collaboration will increase the risk in meeting performance objectives. This committee's principal recommendation is that agencies should conduct Earth and space science projects independently unless: It is judged that cooperation will result in significant added scientific value to the project over what could be achieved by a single agency alone; or unique capabilities reside within one agency that are necessary for the mission success of a project managed by another agency; or the project is intended to transfer from research to operations necessitating a change in responsibility from one agency to another during the project; or there are other compelling reasons to pursue collaboration, for example, a desire to build capacity at one of the cooperating agencies. Even when the total project cost may increase, parties may still find collaboration attractive if their share of a mission is more affordable than funding it alone. In these cases, alternatives to interdependent reliance on another government agency should be considered. For example, agencies may find that buying services from another agency or pursuing interagency coordination of spaceflight data collection is preferable to fully interdependent cooperation."--Publisher's descripiton. |
| Local Note |
eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - North America |
| Subject |
United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
|
|
United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. |
|
United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. |
|
Astronautics -- United States.
|
|
Astronautics. |
|
United States. |
|
Interagency coordination -- United States.
|
|
Interagency coordination. |
| Genre/Form |
Electronic books.
|
|
Electronic books.
|
| Added Author |
National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Assessment of Impediments to Interagency Cooperation on Space and Earth Science Missions.
|
| Other Form: |
Print version: National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Assessment of Impediments to Interagency Cooperation on Space and Earth Science Missions. Assessment of impediments to interagency collaboration on space and earth missions. Washington, D.C. : National Academies Press, ©2011 9780309163507 (OCoLC)743321202 |
| ISBN |
9780309163514 (electronic book) |
|
030916351X (electronic book) |
|
1283135019 |
|
9781283135016 |
|
9780309163507 (print) |
|
0309163501 (print) |
|
