LEADER 00000cam a2200709Mi 4500
001 on1008960083
003 OCoLC
005 20190712071151.8
006 m o d
007 cr |n|||||||||
008 160723t20162016caua ob 000 0 eng d
010 2016429624
019 1058336587|a1061873873|a1066464420|a1076679714
020 0833093134|q(pbk.)
020 9780833093134|q(pbk.)
020 0833095153
020 9780833095152
035 (OCoLC)1008960083|z(OCoLC)1058336587|z(OCoLC)1061873873
|z(OCoLC)1066464420|z(OCoLC)1076679714
040 VT2|beng|epn|cVT2|dOCLCO|dOCLCF|dOCLCA|dUAB|dLOA|dOCLCQ
|dOCLCO|dICG|dICN|dAU@|dERL|dWYU|dU3W|dTXR
043 n-us---
049 RIDW
050 4 UG1523.M35 2016
082 04 358/.84|223
090 UG1523.M35 2016
100 1 McLeod, Gary,|d1948-
245 10 Enhancing space resilience through non-materiel means /
|cGary McLeod, George Nacouzi, Paul Dreyer, Mel Eisman,
Myron Hura, Krista S. Langeland, David Manheim, Geoffrey
Torrington ; prepared for the United States Air Force.
260 Santa Monica, California :|bRAND Corporation,|c[2016]
300 1 online resource (xxii, 70 pages) :|bcolor illustrations.
336 text|btxt|2rdacontent
337 computer|bc|2rdamedia
338 online resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
490 1 Research report ;|vRR-1067-AF
500 "RR-1067-AF"--Page 4 of cover.
500 "RAND Project Air Force."
504 Includes bibliographical references (pages 63-70).
505 00 |tPreface --|tFigures --|tTables --|tSummary --
|tAcknowledgments --|tAbbreviations --|g1.|tIntroduction:
|tBackground --|tObjectives --|tScope --|tSpace resilience
--|tApproach --|tReport structure --|g2.|tResilience and
civil institutions:|tGeneral approaches for building
resilient operations:|tImpact avoidance --|tAdaptation and
flexibility --|tRecovery and restoration --|tPotential
applications to the space operations community --|tSummary
--|g3.|tResilience and U.S. government civil space
agencies:|tCivil policy considerations:|tFull and open
access --|tRapid delivery --|tContinuity of operations --
|tSecurity classification --|tCivil practices:
|tInformation --|tOrganization and tactics --|tCommand and
control --|tTraining --|tPersonnel --|tSummary --|g4.
|tResilience and Air Force space operations:|tOperational
concept --|tFindings: information:|tSpace order of battle
--|tLimited intelligence at SOPS/SWS --|tSpace knowledge
of intelligence personnel --|tSpace Weather effects --
|tSummary --|tFindings: organization and tactics:|tSpace
protection lead --|tSpace protection tactics --|tTactics-
sharing --|tSummary --|tFindings: command and control:
|tSatellite C2 contacts --|tResponsibilities and
authorities --|tAnomaly resolution --|tSummary --
|tFindings: training:|tSpace protection training --
|tExercises --|tMultiple satellite C2 systems --|tSummary
--|tFindings: personnel:|tInitial qualifications --
|tCareer progression --|tTrained operators --|tSummary --
|tCost of implementation options --|tDetailed
recommendations --|g5.|tResilience and a world with
international and commercial partners:|tInformation --
|tOrganization and tactics --|tCommand and control --|g6.
|tRecommendations:|tOverarching recommendations:
|tResilience as a priority --|tSpace protection CONOPS --
|tDetailed recommendations:|tNear-term recommendations --
|tFar-term recommendations --|tROM costs --|gAppendix A:
|tSpace resilience cost analysis.
520 "Space is now a congested, contested, and competitive
environment. Space systems must become more resilient to
potential adversary actions and system failures, but
changes to space systems are costly. To provide a complete
look at resilience and possibly realize some benefit at
lower cost, the Air Force asked RAND to identify non-
materiel means--doctrine, organization, training,
leadership and education, personnel, facilities, and
policy--to enhance space resilience over the near and far
terms. The authors developed implementation options to
improve resilience based on a notional space protection
operational concept: enhancing the capability of space
operators to respond, in a timely and effective manner, to
adversary counterspace actions. Operators need actionable
information, appropriate organization and tactics, and
dynamic command and control, supported by appropriate
tools and decision aids, relevant training and exercises,
and qualified personnel brought into the career field. The
authors also recommend that Air Force Space Command
develop a formal, end-to-end, space protection concept of
operations (CONOPS) that captures all elements needed to
improve resilience. In addition, the CONOPS could
potentially follow the tenet of centralized control and
decentralized execution in certain situations, such as
when responding to adversary counterspace actions. For the
near-term options, the rough order of magnitude (ROM)
nonrecurring engineering (NRE) cost of implementation is
estimated to be between $2.5 million and $3.6 million. For
the far-term options, the ROM NRE cost is estimated to be
between $109 million and $166 million, with the ROM
recurring cost between $4 million and $5.4 million per
year"--Publisher's description.
546 English.
590 JSTOR|bBooks at JSTOR Open Access
610 10 United States.|bAir Force|xOperational readiness.
610 17 United States.|bAir Force.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst00538280
648 7 2000-2099|2fast
650 0 Astronautics, Military|zUnited States|xHistory|y21st
century.
650 0 Space security|xHistory|y21st century.
650 0 Organizational resilience|xHistory|y21st century.
655 0 Electronic book.
655 7 History.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01411628
700 1 Nacouzi, George.
700 1 Dreyer, Paul,|d1973-
700 1 Eisman, Mel,|d1949-
700 1 Hura, Myron,|d1943-
700 1 Langeland, Krista S.
700 1 Manheim, David.
700 1 Torrington, Geoffrey.
710 2 Project Air Force (U.S.)
710 2 Rand Corporation.
776 08 |iPrint version:|aMcLeod, Gary, 1948-|tEnhancing space
resilience through non-materiel means.|dSanta Monica,
California : RAND Corporation, [2016]|w(DLC) 2016429624
830 0 Research report (Rand Corporation) ;|vRR-1067-AF.
856 40 |uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt1btc13z
|zOnline eBook. Open Access via JSTOR.
948 |d20190820|cJSTOR EBSCO|tJSTOROpenAccess
EBSCOebooksacademic UPDATES 5472J 1248 BOTH 7-12-19|lridw
948 |d20180926|clti|tlti-aex
948 |d20180419|cJSTOR|tJSTOROpenAccess NEW March16,23,30,Apr6,
13|lridw
994 92|bRID
