| Description |
1 online resource. |
|
text file |
| Series |
Benjamins current topics, 1874-0081 ; 76
|
|
Benjamins current topics, 1874-0081 ; 76.
|
| Bibliography |
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| Contents |
Argumentation in Political Deliberation; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Argumentation in political deliberation; 1. Argumentation theory and political deliberation; 2. Overview of the volume; Acknowledgements; References; Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse in political deliberation; 1. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse; 2. Conventionalization of communicative practices in communicative activity types; 3. Institutional constraints on strategic maneuvering; 4. Pragma-dialectical research of argumentative discourse in the political domain. |
|
The place of counter discourse in two methods of public deliberation1. Introduction; 2. Two methods of public deliberation; 2.1 Consensus conference; French consensus conference on nanotechnology; 2.2 Public hearing; The public hearing on nanotechnology; 2.3 Public participation vs. public communication types of deliberation; 3. Defining public deliberation within argumentation studies; 4. Counter discourse in the two methods of public deliberation; 4.1 Counter discourse in the consensus conference; 4.2 Counter discourse in the public hearing; 5. Concluding remarks; Acknowledgements. |
|
3. Political online forums as argumentative communities4. Research design; The online forum Climategate.nl; Data selection; Method of analysis; 5. Analysis; Fragment A: 8-12 December 2009; Fragment B: 17 January-3 February 2010; Fragment C: 14-21 June 2010; Fragment D: 18-21 April 2011; Fragment E: 27 April-2 May 2011; 6. Conclusion; Acknowledgements; References; Debating multiple positions in multi-party online deliberation; 1. Introduction; 2. Bin Laden is dead and what now; 3. Participants in online deliberation; 4. Sides, positions, cases, and parties in argumentation; 5. Conclusion. |
| Summary |
Dialectical approaches traditionally conceptualize argumentation as a discussion in which two parties debate on "two sides of an issue" (pro and con). However, many political issues engender multiple positions. This is clear in multi-party online deliberations in which often an array of competing positions is debated in one and the same discussion. A proponent of a given position thus addresses a number of possible opponents, who in turn may hold incompatible opinions. The goal of this chapter is to shed extra light on such "polylogical" clash of opinions in online deliberation, by examining t. |
| Local Note |
eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - North America |
| Subject |
Persuasion (Rhetoric) -- Political aspects.
|
|
Persuasion (Rhetoric) -- Political aspects. |
|
Persuasion (Rhetoric) |
|
Discourse analysis -- Political aspects.
|
|
Discourse analysis -- Political aspects. |
|
Discourse analysis. |
|
Mass media -- Political aspects.
|
|
Mass media -- Political aspects. |
| Genre/Form |
Electronic books.
|
| Added Author |
Lewinski, Marcin, editor.
|
|
Mohammed, Dima, editor.
|
| Other Form: |
Print version: Argumentation in political deliberation. Amsterdam ; Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company, [2015] 9789027242648 (DLC) 2015014504 |
| ISBN |
9789027268273 (pdf) |
|
9027268274 (pdf) |
|
9789027242648 (hardback ; alkaline paper) |
|
