The role of legal argumentation and human dignity in constitutional courts : proceedings of the special workshops held at the 28th World Congress of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy in Lisbon, 2017 / edited by Miguel Nogueira de Brito, Rachel Herdy, Giovanni Damele, Pedro Moniz Lopes, Jorge Silva Sampaio.
Intro; Contents; Introduction; Part I: The Role of Legal Argumentation in Constitutional Courts; Giovanni Damele: Naturalistic Argument and Appeal to Common Sense in Constitutional Argumentation; Rachel Herdy: Appeals to Expert Opinion in High Courts; Fernando Leal: "Less is More": Against Argumentative Saturation in Legal Decision-Making; Thomas Bustamante: Abusive Obiter Dicta: A Typology of Illegitimate Judicial Pronouncements; Chiara Valentini: Rights, Proportionalism and Inclusive Adjudication
Alberto Puppo: Local Priority in Constitutional Argumentation: Threat or Healthy Contribution to International Law?Part II: The Use of Human Dignity within Judicial Argumentation; Miguel Nogueira de Brito: Is there Any Absolute Concept of Dignity?; Pedro Moniz Lopes: Interpretative and Normative Ambivalences of Human Dignity: Rights, Dignity and Morality in Fleming V Ireland; Jorge Silva Sampaio: Human Dignity's Contestedness, Analytical Reconstruction of the Prohibition of Instrumentalization and a Reassessment of the Aviation Security Act Case
Mariana Melo Egídio: The Argument from Human Dignity -- Legal Paternalism and Restriction on Fundamental RightsEditors and Contributors
Local Note
eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - North America