LEADER 00000cam a2200745Mi 4500
001 ocn763157937
003 OCoLC
005 20190405013944.3
006 m o d
007 cr |n|---|||||
008 111128s2011 enk ob 001 0 eng d
019 760055440|a770033243|a874826804|a962803754|a963749028
020 9781139118118
020 1139118110
020 9781139003926|q(ebook)
020 1139003925|q(ebook)
020 9781107013254|q(hardback)
020 1107013259|q(hardback)
020 9781139128773|q(electronic book)
020 1139128779|q(electronic book)
020 |z9781107613041|q(paperback)
035 (OCoLC)763157937|z(OCoLC)760055440|z(OCoLC)770033243
|z(OCoLC)874826804|z(OCoLC)962803754|z(OCoLC)963749028
040 EBLCP|beng|epn|cEBLCP|dOCLCQ|dIDEBK|dMHW|dAUD|dOCLCQ
|dDEBSZ|dOCLCQ|dOCLCO|dDKDLA|dOCLCF|dN$T|dUIU|dCAMBR
|dOCLCQ|dYDX|dOCLCQ|dUEJ|dUAB|dOCLCQ
049 RIDW
050 4 K3165 .H428 2011
072 7 LA|2bicssc
072 7 LAW|x018000|2bisacsh
072 7 LAW|x075000|2bisacsh
082 04 342.001
090 K3165 .H428 2011
100 1 Huscroft, Grant.|0https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/
n98103263
245 14 The Challenge of Originalism :|bTheories of Constitutional
Interpretation.
264 1 Cambridge :|bCambridge University Press,|c2011.
300 1 online resource (318 pages)
336 text|btxt|2rdacontent
337 computer|bc|2rdamedia
338 online resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 text file|2rdaft
500 Proposition 6: When interpreting such a constitution, the
judges' primary duty is to reveal and clarify its pre-
existing meaning. When that meaning is insufficiently
determinate to resolve the case at hand, their secondary
duty is to act creatively and supplement it. To supplement
the meaning of the constitution is not to change it.
500 Proposition 7: Although judges must not deliberately
change the constitution, there are at least four ways in
which constitutional law can and does legitimately evolve
over time. To that considerable extent, originalism is
perfectly consistent with "common law constitutionalism"
and "living constitutionalism."
504 Includes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 Cover; Title; Copyright; Contents; Preface; Contributors;
The Challenge of Originalism: Theories of Constitutional
Interpretation; I; II; III; IV; V; PART ONE. EXPOSITION
AND DEFENSE; 1 What Is Originalism? The Evolution of
Contemporary Originalist Theory; I. Introduction; II. A
Word About the Word: The Origins of "Originalism"; III. A
Very Short History of Contemporary Originalist Theory; A.
Original Intentions of the Framers; B. The Misconceived
Quest and the Original Understanding of Original
Intentions; C. Original Understanding of the Ratifiers; D.
We the People.
505 8 E. Original Public Meaning and the New OriginalismsF.
Original Applications and Original Methods; G. New Critics
of the New Originalism; H. District of Columbia v. Heller
& McDonald v. City of Chicago; IV. What Is Originalism?;
V. Originalism and Living Constitutionalism; VI.
Conclusion; 2 The Case for Originalism; I. The Best
Argument for Originalism; II. Elaboration, Qualification,
and Defense; Proposition 1: A constitution, like any other
law, necessarily has a meaning that pre-exists judicial
interpretation of it.; Proposition 2: The meaning of a law
is part (perhaps all) of what it is.
505 8 Therefore, to change the meaning of a law is to change the
law. Proposition 3: The original meaning of a constitution
is neither its original literal meaning (called "sentence
meaning" by philosophers) nor its originally intended
meaning ("speakers meaning"); it is, instead, its
"utterance meaning," which is determined by a restricted
range of evidence, extra-textual as well as textual, of
what its founders intended it to mean.
505 8 Proposition 4: When a constitution itself requires that it
be changed only by some special democratic procedure, this
binds judges as well as other officials. The judges must
not change the constitution- or, by inference from
Proposition 2, its meaning- by purporting to "interpret"
it. Proposition 5: Any judge who violated that requirement
would flout the constitution itself, the rule of law, the
principle of democracy, and (in many federal systems) the
principle of federalism.
520 Provides an introduction to the development of originalist
thought and showcases the great range of contemporary
originalist constitutional scholarship.
588 0 Print version record.
590 eBooks on EBSCOhost|bEBSCO eBook Subscription Academic
Collection - North America
650 0 Constitutional law|xPhilosophy.|0https://id.loc.gov/
authorities/subjects/sh2008101028
650 0 Law|xInterpretation and construction.|0https://id.loc.gov/
authorities/subjects/sh85075135
650 0 Origin (Philosophy)|0https://id.loc.gov/authorities/
subjects/sh94009707
650 7 Constitutional law|xPhilosophy.|2fast|0https://
id.worldcat.org/fast/875821
650 7 Law|xInterpretation and construction.|2fast|0https://
id.worldcat.org/fast/993756
650 7 Origin (Philosophy)|2fast|0https://id.worldcat.org/fast/
1048180
650 7 Law.|2homoit|0https://homosaurus.org/v3/homoit0000702
655 4 Electronic books.
700 1 Miller, Bradley.
776 08 |iPrint version:|aHuscroft, Grant.|tChallenge of
Originalism : Theories of Constitutional Interpretation.
|dCambridge : Cambridge University Press, ©2011
|z9781107013254
856 40 |uhttps://rider.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://
search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&
db=nlebk&AN=400600|zOnline eBook via EBSCO. Access
restricted to current Rider University students, faculty,
and staff.
856 42 |3Instructions for reading/downloading the EBSCO version
of this eBook|uhttp://guides.rider.edu/ebooks/ebsco
901 MARCIVE 20231220
948 |d20190507|cEBSCO|tEBSCOebooksacademic NEW 4-5-19 7552
|lridw
994 92|bRID
