LEADER 00000cam a2200613Mi 4500 
001    ocn769341969 
003    OCoLC 
005    20160527040919.1 
006    m     o  d         
007    cr |n|---||||| 
008    111226s1981    pau     o     000 0 eng d 
019    762098131|a816871417 
020    9789027280909|q(electronic book) 
020    9027280908|q(electronic book) 
020    1283328909 
020    9781283328906 
020    |z9786613328908 
020    |z6613328901 
035    (OCoLC)769341969|z(OCoLC)762098131|z(OCoLC)816871417 
040    EBLCP|beng|epn|cEBLCP|dIDEBK|dN$T|dOCLCQ|dOCLCF|dOCLCQ
       |dOCLCO|dYDXCP|dOCLCQ 
049    RIDW 
050  4 PC2131 
072  7 CF|2bicssc 
072  7 FOR|x017000|2bisacsh 
072  7 LAN|x016000|2bisacsh 
072  7 LAN|x014000|2bisacsh 
082 04 400 
090    PC2131 
100 1  Love, Nigel.|0https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/
       n81143800 
245 10 Generative Phonology :|ba Case Study from French. 
264  1 Amsterdam/Philadelphia :|bJohn Benjamins Publishing 
       Company,|c1981. 
300    1 online resource (249 pages) 
336    text|btxt|2rdacontent 
337    computer|bc|2rdamedia 
338    online resource|bcr|2rdacarrier 
347    text file|2rdaft 
505 0  GENERATIVE PHONOLOGYA Case-Study from French; Editorial 
       page; Title page; Copyright page; PREFACE; Table of 
       contents; INTRODUCTION; FINAL SEGMENTS AND GENDER 
       INFLECTION IN FRENCH; 1. THE DELETION RULES; 1.1 Liaison 
       as non-deletion; 1.2 Liaison as metathesis; 1.3 Liaison as
       syntax; 2. EXCEPTIONS TO THE DELETION RULES; 2.1 There are
       exceptions to the deletion rules; 2.2 There are no 
       exceptions to the deletion rules; 2.3 There are exceptions
       to the deletion rules; 3. INVARIANT ADJECTIVES; 3.1 Vowel-
       final stems; 3.2 Consonant-final stems; 4. THE SCOPE OF 
       THE DELETION RULES. 
505 8  4.1 Nasals and nasalisation4.2 Derivational augments and 
       'secondary derivation'·; 5. ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS; 5.1 
       There is no consonant deletion rule: liaison as 
       epenthesis; 5.2 There is a (minor) consonant deletion 
       rule; 6. THE FUNCTIONAL UNITY OF ELISION AND LIAISON; 6.1 
       Elision and liaison as natural rules; 6.2 Elision and 
       liaison as conspiratorial rules; 7. SUMMARY; 7.1 Final 
       segments; 7.2 Gender inflection; CONCLUSION; REFERENCES. 
520    This study is a discussion of, rather than a contribution 
       to, generative phonology. The central question posed, is: 
       Does linguistic theory provide a basis for choosing 
       between competing grammars -- that is, an evaluation 
       procedure for grammars? If so, then what is its form? If 
       not, then how are we to interpret controversies between 
       linguists as to the relative merits of competing grammars?
       These issues will be discussed in relation to a particular
       problem of evaluation in the treatment of the morphonology
       of final segments in Modern French. 
588 0  Print version record. 
590    eBooks on EBSCOhost|bEBSCO eBook Subscription Academic 
       Collection - North America 
650  0 French language|xPhonology.|0https://id.loc.gov/
       authorities/subjects/sh2008104136 
650  0 French language|xGrammar, Generative.|0https://id.loc.gov/
       authorities/subjects/sh2008121230 
650  7 French language|xPhonology.|2fast|0https://id.worldcat.org
       /fast/934532 
650  7 French language|xGrammar, Generative.|2fast|0https://
       id.worldcat.org/fast/934471 
655  4 Electronic books. 
776 08 |iPrint version:|aLove, Nigel.|tGenerative Phonology : A 
       Case Study from French.|dAmsterdam/Philadelphia : John 
       Benjamins Publishing Company, ©1981|z9789027231130 
856 40 |uhttps://rider.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://
       search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&
       db=nlebk&AN=407370|zOnline eBook. Access restricted to 
       current Rider University students, faculty, and staff. 
856 42 |3Instructions for reading/downloading this eBook|uhttp://
       guides.rider.edu/ebooks/ebsco 
901    MARCIVE 20231220 
948    |d20160607|cEBSCO|tebscoebooksacademic|lridw 
994    92|bRID