LEADER 00000cam a2200589Ii 4500
001 ocn975003235
003 OCoLC
005 20230113054233.0
006 m o d
007 cr mn|||||||||
008 170310t20172017dcua ob 000 0 eng d
019 975687988|a1026998326|a1031557470|a1039212277|a1047579830
|a1048171765|a1055258579|a1058411635
020 0309451035
020 9780309451031|q(electronic book)
020 |z9780309451024|q(paperback)
020 |z0309451027|q(paperback)
035 (OCoLC)975003235|z(OCoLC)975687988|z(OCoLC)1026998326
|z(OCoLC)1031557470|z(OCoLC)1039212277|z(OCoLC)1047579830
|z(OCoLC)1048171765|z(OCoLC)1055258579|z(OCoLC)1058411635
040 CUS|beng|erda|epn|cCUS|dUAB|dCUS|dOCLCF|dMERER|dGZM|dYDX
|dBUF|dOSU|dORU|dOCLCQ|dORU|dAU@|dVT2|dV5E|dEZ9|dINT
|dUKAHL|dOCLCQ|dAAA|dOCLCO|dN$T|dOCLCQ
043 n-us---
049 RIDW
050 4 Q223|b.N38 2017eb
082 04 501/.4|223
090 Q223|b.N38 2017eb
110 2 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
(U.S.).|0https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2015135192
|bCommittee on the Science of Science Communication: a
Research Agenda.
245 10 Communicating science effectively :|ba research agenda /
|cCommittee on the Science of Science Communication: a
Research Agenda, Division of Behavioral and Social
Sciences and Education ; a report of the National
Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine.
264 1 Washington, DC :|bThe National Academies Press,|c[2017]
264 4 |c©2017
300 1 online resource (xiv, 138 pages) :|billustrations
336 text|btxt|2rdacontent
337 computer|bc|2rdamedia
338 online resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
340 |gpolychrome|2rdacc
347 text file|2rdaft
504 Includes bibliographical references (pages 101-123).
505 00 |gMachine generated contents note:|g1.|tUsing Science to
Improve Science Communication --|tPurpose and Scope of
This Study --|tDiversity of Science Communicators and
Their Goals --|tGoals of Communicating Science --|tEthical
Considerations --|tSimple -- and False -- Model of Science
Communication --|tOrganization of the Report --|g2.
|tComplexities of Communicating Science --|tVarying Needs
for and Responses to Scientific Information --|tNeed for
Formal Public Engagement --|tChallenges Posed by
Scientific Content --|tKey Individual and Organizational
Factors: Different Audiences, Different Needs --|tPrior
Knowledge of Science: Debunking the "Deficit Model" --
|tAbility to Understand Numeric Information --|tWays of
Interpreting New Information --|tBeliefs People Use to
Explain the World --|tMental Shortcuts: Heuristics,
Emotion, and Motivated Reasoning --|tCognitive Dissonance
--|tSocial Influences on How People Interpret Science --
|tPresenting Information in Different Forms --|tFraming --
|tGain/Loss Framing --|tEmphasis Framing --|tHelping
Audiences Understand Uncertainty and Complexity --
|tSpecial Case of Policy Maker Audiences --|tAggregation
and Translation --|tBrokering --|tPartnerships --|tTrust
and Credibility of Science Communication --|tFactors That
Affect Trust and Credibility --|tOutcomes of Science
Communication Affected by Trust and Credibility --
|tApplying the Lessons of Large-Scale Science
Communication Efforts --|tExposure --|tTiming --|tDuration
--|g3.|tNature of Science-Related Public Controversies --
|tOrigins and Dynamics of Science-Related Controversies --
|tConflicts over Beliefs, Values, and Interests --
|tUnderstanding the Role of Beliefs and Values of
Individuals --|tCommunicating Science in the Context of
Competing Beliefs, Values, and Interests --|tTailoring
Messages from Science for Understanding and Persuasion --
|tEngaging the Public --|tPerceptions of Uncertainty --
|tUncertainty about the Science Itself --
|tMisunderstanding and Misrepresentation of Scientific
Uncertainty --|tCommunicating Uncertainty and Consensus
amid Controversy --|tAmplified Voices of Organized
Interests and Influential Individuals --|tFraming the
Issues Involving Science --|tDebunking Misinformation --
|tWorking with Opinion Leaders to Inform and Persuade --
|g4.|tCommunicating Science in a Complex, Competitive
Communication Environment --|tTrends in the Communication
of Science News --|tHow Journalistic Decisions Affect
Science Coverage and Audiences --|tHow Science Is Covered
in Mainstream News --|tHow Coverage of Science Affects
Public Perceptions --|tOpportunities for Communicating
Science: Social Media, Social Networks, and Blogs --
|tSocial Media --|tSocial Networks --|tBlogs --|tEmerging
Research on Use of the Internet as a Source of Science
News --|tPreference-Based Effects --|tContextualized News
--|tWidening Knowledge Gaps --|g5.|tBuilding the Knowledge
Base for Effective Science Communication --|tGeneral
Conceptual and Methodological Issues --|tAligning Goals
with the Right Communication Approach --|tUsing a Systems
Approach to Guide Research on Science Communication --
|tAssessing the Effectiveness of Science Communication --
|tComparing across National, International, and Cultural
Contexts --|tMajor Challenges for Practice and Research in
Science Communication --|tUnderstanding the Converging
Influences on Science Communication --|tEngaging Formally
with the Public about Science --|tUnderstanding the
Special Complexities of Communicating Science in the Face
of Public Controversy --|tConflicts over Beliefs, Values,
and Interests --|tUncertainty in Science-Related
Controversy --|tAmplified Voices in Science-Related
Controversy --|tCommunicating Science in a Complex,
Dynamic, and Competitive Communication Media Environment -
-|tAdditional Questions for Research --|tBuilding a
Coherent Science Communication Research Enterprise --
|tFinal Thoughts --|tReferences --|tAppendixes --|gA.
|tAgendas of Public Meetings.
520 1 "Science and technology are embedded in virtually every
aspect of modern life. As a result, people face an
increasing need to integrate information from science with
their personal values and other considerations as they
make important life decisions about medical care, the
safety of foods, what to do about climate change, and many
other issues. Communicating science effectively, however,
is a complex task and an acquired skill. Moreover, the
approaches to communicating science that will be most
effective for specific audiences and circumstances are not
obvious. Fortunately, there is an expanding science base
from diverse disciplines that can support science
communicators in making these determinations.
Communicating Science Effectively offers a research agenda
for science communicators and researchers seeking to apply
this research and fill gaps in knowledge about how to
communicate effectively about science, focusing in
particular on issues that are contentious in the public
sphere. To inform this research agenda, this publication
identifies important influences -- psychological, economic,
political, social, cultural, and media-related -- on how
science related to such issues is understood, perceived,
and used"--Publisher's description
588 0 Print version record.
590 eBooks on EBSCOhost|bEBSCO eBook Subscription Academic
Collection - North America
650 0 Communication in science.|0https://id.loc.gov/authorities/
subjects/sh85029094
650 0 Visual communication in science.|0https://id.loc.gov/
authorities/subjects/sh2005005260
650 0 Communication of technical information.|0https://
id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85029107
650 7 Communication in science.|2fast|0https://id.worldcat.org/
fast/870268
650 7 Visual communication in science.|2fast|0https://
id.worldcat.org/fast/1737997
650 7 Communication of technical information.|2fast|0https://
id.worldcat.org/fast/870307
776 08 |iPrint version:|tCommunicating science effectively.
|dWashington, DC : National Academies Press, [2017]
|z9780309451024|w(DLC) 2017934109|w(OCoLC)968772863
856 40 |uhttps://rider.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://
search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&
db=nlebk&AN=1500024|zOnline ebook via EBSCO. Access
restricted to current Rider University students, faculty,
and staff.
856 42 |3Instructions for reading/downloading the EBSCO version
of this ebook|uhttp://guides.rider.edu/ebooks/ebsco
901 MARCIVE 20231220
948 |d20230203|cEBSCO|tEBSCOebooksacademic NEW 6073 Quarterly
|lridw
994 92|bRID
