LEADER 00000cam a22005653i 4500 001 ocn951754683 003 OCoLC 005 20171103075951.7 006 m o d 007 cr |n||||||||| 008 160615s2016 kyu ob 001 0 eng d 020 9780813168432|q(electronic book) 020 0813168430|q(electronic book) 020 9780813168302|q(electronic book) 020 0813168309|q(electronic book) 020 |z9780813168296|q(hardcover ;|qalkaline paper) 020 |z0813168295|q(hardcover ;|qalkaline paper) 020 |z0813168309|q(pdf) 035 (OCoLC)951754683 037 22573/ctt1cz4cdb|bJSTOR 040 YDXCP|beng|epn|cYDXCP|dN$T|dP@U|dN$T|dJSTOR|dOCLCF|dOCLCQ |dCOCUF|dCNNOR|dLOA|dMERUC|dK6U|dCOO 049 RIDW 050 4 U21.2|b.D73 2016 072 7 POL|x000000|2bisacsh 082 04 172/.42|223 090 U21.2|b.D73 2016 100 1 Dubik, James M.,|0https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/ n94036781|eauthor. 245 10 Just war reconsidered :|bstrategy, ethics, and theory / |cJames M. Dubik. 264 1 Lexington, Kentucky :|bUniversity Press of Kentucky, |c[2016] 300 1 online resource. 336 text|btxt|2rdacontent 337 computer|bc|2rdamedia 338 online resource|bcr|2rdacarrier 347 text file|2rdaft 490 1 Battles and campaigns 505 0 Prologue -- Jus in bello's missing piece -- Describing jus in bello's war-waging dimension -- Principals and agents - - Dialogue and the nature of war -- The decision-execution regime -- Jus in bello's war-waging principles -- Epilogue. 520 "In the seminal Just and Unjust Wars, Michael Walzer famously considered the ethics of modern warfare, examining the moral issues that arise before, during, and after conflict. However, Walzer and subsequent scholars have often limited their analyses of the ethics of combat to soldiers on the ground and failed to recognize the moral responsibilities of senior political and military leaders. In Just War Reconsidered: Strategy, Ethics, and Theory, James M. Dubik draws on years of research as well as his own experiences as a soldier and teacher to fill the gaps left by other theorists. He applies moral philosophy, political philosophy, and strategic studies to historical and contemporary case studies to reveal the inaccuracies and moral bankruptcy that inform some of the literature on military ethics. Conventional just war theory adopts a binary approach, wherein political leaders have moral accountability for the decision to go to war and soldiers have accountability for fighting the war ethically. Dubik argues, however, that political and military leadership should be held accountable for the planning and execution of war in addition to the decision to initiate conflict. Dubik bases his sober reassessment on the fundamental truth that war risks the lives of soldiers and innocents as well as the political and social health of communities. He offers new standards to evaluate the ethics of warfare in the hope of increasing the probability that the lives of soldiers will not be used in vain and the innocent not put at risk unnecessarily."-- Provided by publisher. 590 eBooks on EBSCOhost|bEBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - North America 650 0 Just war doctrine.|0https://id.loc.gov/authorities/ subjects/sh85071117 650 7 Just war doctrine.|2fast|0https://id.worldcat.org/fast/ 985112 655 4 Electronic books. 776 08 |iPrint version:|z9780813168296|z0813168295|w(DLC) 2016025073|w(OCoLC)945951434 830 0 Battles & campaigns.|0https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names /no2001064545 856 40 |uhttps://rider.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http:// search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site& db=nlebk&AN=1215636|zOnline eBook. Access restricted to current Rider University students, faculty, and staff. 856 42 |3Instructions for reading/downloading this eBook|uhttp:// guides.rider.edu/ebooks/ebsco 901 MARCIVE 20231220 948 |d20171110|cEBSCO|tebscoebooksacademic NEW|lridw 994 92|bRID