Skip to content
You are not logged in |Login  

LEADER 00000cam a2200937Ki 4500 
001    ocn870532447 
003    OCoLC 
005    20190712071319.6 
006    m     o  d         
007    cr cn||||||||| 
008    140214s2013    caua    ob    000 0 eng d 
019    869853602|a1008950527|a1066436071 
020    9780833084606|q(electronic book) 
020    0833084607|q(electronic book) 
020    |z0833080989 
020    |z9780833080981 
027    RAND/TL-112-OSD 
035    (OCoLC)870532447|z(OCoLC)869853602|z(OCoLC)1008950527
       |z(OCoLC)1066436071 
037    22573/ctt5p32tz|bJSTOR 
040    AD#|beng|epn|cAD#|dCOO|dJSTOR|dOCLCO|dJSTOR|dYDXCP|dECB
       |dOCLCQ|dOCLCO|dTEF|dOCLCQ|dVT2|dLND|dLOA|dVFL|dICG|dOCLCF
       |dU3W|dICN|dCEF|dOCLCQ|dAU@|dERL|dWYU|dTXR|dNJT 
043    n-us--- 
049    RIDW 
050  4 UA12|b.R36 2013eb 
072  7 POL011000|2bisacsh 
072  7 POL012000|2bisacsh 
072  7 COM062000|2bisacsh 
072  7 POL021000|2bisacsh 
082 04 355/.0320973|223 
090    UA12|b.R36 2013eb 
100 1  Paul, Christopher,|d1971-|0https://id.loc.gov/authorities/
       names/n2004002382|eauthor. 
245 14 The RAND security cooperation prioritization and 
       propensity matching tool /|cChristopher Paul, Michael 
       Nixon, Heather Peterson, Beth Grill, Jessica Yeats. 
264  1 Santa Monica, CA :|bRAND,|c2013. 
300    1 online resource (57 pages) 
336    text|btxt|2rdacontent 
337    computer|bc|2rdamedia 
338    online resource|bcr|2rdacarrier 
340    |gpolychrome|2rdacc 
347    text file|2rdaft 
500    "RAND National Defense Research Institute." 
500    "This research was ... conducted within the International 
       Security and Defense Policy Center of the RAND National 
       Defense Research Institute"--Preface. 
504    Includes bibliographical references (pages 51-57). 
505 0  Introduction: prioritizing security cooperation -- 
       Foundational RAND research: what works best when building 
       partner capacity and under what circumstances? -- Research
       and tool development -- The RAND security cooperation 
       prioritization and propensity matching tool -- Conclusions
       : appropriate employment of the tool -- Appendix A: 
       Categories, constructs, and measures -- Appendix B: Tool 
       validation through case studies -- Appendix C: 
       Mathematical methods -- Appendix D: Updating the currency 
       of the tool. 
520    Security cooperation is the umbrella term used to describe
       a wide range of programs and activities with such goals as
       building relationships between the United States and 
       partner countries, developing these countries' security 
       capabilities, and facilitating contingency and peacetime 
       access by U.S. forces. With increased pressure on defense 
       spending, the scope and budget for these activities are 
       likely to decrease. Therefore, it will be important for 
       the U.S. Department of Defense to scrutinize and, perhaps,
       reevaluate current and proposed security cooperation 
       efforts, ensuring that expected benefits align with costs 
       and corresponding policy priorities. Recent RAND research 
       identified practices and contextual factors associated 
       with greater or lesser degrees of success in security 
       cooperation, using 29 historical case studies of U.S. 
       efforts to build partner capacity since the end of the 
       Cold War. The RAND Security Cooperation Prioritization and
       Propensity Matching Tool applies these findings and 
       results from other existing research to all current and 
       potential security cooperation partners. This customizable
       diagnostic tool, built in Microsoft Excel®, will help 
       planners preliminarily identify mismatches between the 
       importance of a country to U.S. interests, funding for 
       initiatives, and the propensity for successful U.S. 
       security cooperation with a given country. For each of the
       world's 195 countries, the tool produces an overall 
       security cooperation propensity score. Planners can then 
       compare these scores with available funding and security 
       cooperation priorities. The tool has the virtues of being 
       systematic, being based on global data, and not relying on
       subjective assessments. Strategic thinking and nuanced 
       understanding of individual countries remain important, 
       but the tool is useful in helping to identify which 
       countries to scrutinize. 
588 0  Print version record. 
588 0  Print version. 
590    JSTOR|bBooks at JSTOR Open Access 
648  7 1989-|2fast 
648  7 Since 1989|2fast 
650  0 Decision making|xData processing.|0https://id.loc.gov/
       authorities/subjects/sh2008102118 
650  0 Military assistance, American|0https://id.loc.gov/
       authorities/subjects/sh85085145|xPlanning.|0https://
       id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2002006228 
650  0 National security|xInternational cooperation.|0https://
       id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2010103212 
650  0 Security, International.|0https://id.loc.gov/authorities/
       subjects/sh85119471 
650  7 Decision making|xData processing.|2fast|0https://
       id.worldcat.org/fast/889041 
650  7 Military assistance, American.|2fast|0https://
       id.worldcat.org/fast/1020932 
650  7 Planning.|2fast|0https://id.worldcat.org/fast/1065224 
650  7 National security|xInternational cooperation.|2fast|0https
       ://id.worldcat.org/fast/1033726 
650  7 Security, International.|2fast|0https://id.worldcat.org/
       fast/1110895 
650  7 International relations.|2fast|0https://id.worldcat.org/
       fast/977053 
650  7 Military policy.|2fast|0https://id.worldcat.org/fast/
       1021386 
651  0 United States|xForeign relations|y1989-|0https://
       id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh93001742 
651  0 United States|xMilitary policy.|0https://id.loc.gov/
       authorities/subjects/sh85140379 
651  7 United States.|2fast|0https://id.worldcat.org/fast/1204155
655  0 Electronic books. 
655  4 Electronic books. 
700 1  Nixon, Michael J.|q(Michael Joseph),|0https://id.loc.gov/
       authorities/names/no98075237|eauthor. 
700 1  Peterson, Heather,|0https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/
       n2009015098|eauthor. 
700 1  Grill, Beth,|0https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/
       no2010122347|eauthor. 
700 1  Yeats, Jessica M.,|0https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/
       no2014107301|eauthor. 
710 2  International Security and Defense Policy Center.|0https:/
       /id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2002068311 
710 2  National Defense Research Institute (U.S.)|0https://
       id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n91060525 
710 2  Rand Corporation,|0https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/
       n78083407|epublisher. 
710 1  United States.|bDepartment of Defense.|bOffice of the 
       Secretary of Defense.|0https://id.loc.gov/authorities/
       names/n86019386 
776 08 |iPrint version:|aPaul, Christopher, 1971-|tRAND security 
       cooperation prioritization and propensity matching tool.
       |dSanta Monica, CA : RAND, 2013|w(DLC)  2013954302 
856 40 |uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt5vjwg5|zOnline
       eBook. Open Access via JSTOR. 
901    MARCIVE 20231220 
948    |d20190820|cJSTOR EBSCO|tJSTOROpenAccess 
       EBSCOebooksacademic UPDATES 5472J 1248 BOTH 7-12-19|lridw 
948    |d20180926|clti|tlti-aex 
948    |d20171005|cJSTOR|tJSTOROpenAccess new|lridw 
994    92|bRID