Skip to content
You are not logged in |Login  
     
Limit search to available items
Record:   Prev Next
Resources
More Information
Bestseller
BestsellerE-book

Title Using EPIC to find conflicts, inconsistencies, and gaps in Department of Defense policies / Carolyn Wong, Daniel Gonzales, Chad J.R. Ohlandt, Eric Landree, John Hollywood.

Publication Info. Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2013.

Item Status

Description 1 online resource (xxii, 63 pages) : color illustrations.
text file PDF
Series Technical report Using EPIC to find conflicts, inconsistencies, and gaps in Department of Defense policies
Note "RAND National Defense Research Institute."
"This research was conducted within the Acquisition and Technology Policy Center (ATPC) of RAND National Defense Research Institute"--Preface.
Bibliography Includes bibliographical references (pages 61-63).
Contents Introduction -- The R&R policy analysis framework and methodology --The EPIC tool -- The program manager case study -- The interoperability and standards case Study -- The information assurance case study -- Closing remarks and recommendations -- Appendix: EPIC.
Summary The authors present a framework and methodology to identify the roles and responsibilities (R & R) of those implementing Department of Defense policies and also potential conflicts, ambiguities, gaps, inconsistencies, and redundancies in those policies. They introduce a new software tool that automates one step of the methodology-EPIC-and demonstrate its use with three case studies to illustrate the technique and also the tool's flexibility. EPIC allows analysts to efficiently analyze multiple policy documents to detect potential conflicts in policy early on, thereby allowing policy developers to focus their attention on the need for clarification and, possibly, changes in policy. The authors relate executive positions to R & R and the products that result from their execution. If it can be shown that more than one actor is assigned to take the same action on the same product, then a potential conflict exists in the body of policy. If, on the other hand, no executive is assigned to take action on a product, then there is a potential gap in the body of policy. Use of this new tool will result in better and more consistent defense policy.
Local Note JSTOR Books at JSTOR Open Access
Language English.
Subject United States. Department of Defense -- Personnel management -- Data processing.
United States. Department of Defense.
Personnel management.
United States. Department of Defense -- Officials and employees -- Selection and appointment.
Manpower -- United States.
Manpower.
United States.
Genre/Form Electronic books.
Electronic books.
Added Author Wong, Carolyn, 1952- author.
Gonzales, Daniel, 1956- author.
Ohlandt, Chad J. R., author.
Landree, Eric, author.
Hollywood, John S., 1973- author.
Acquisition and Technology Policy Center.
Rand Corporation.
United States. Navy.
Other Form: 9780833076762
0833076760
ISBN 9780833081926 (electronic book)
0833081926 (electronic book)
9780833076762
0833076760
Report No. RAND/TR-1277-NAVY