Skip to content
You are not logged in |Login  
     
Limit search to available items
Record:   Prev Next
Resources
More Information
Bestseller
BestsellerE-book
Author Grashof, Franziska, 1988- author.

Title National Procedural Autonomy Revisited : Consequences of Differences in National Administrative Litigation Rules for the Enforcement of European Union Environmental Law : The Case of the EIA Directive / Franziska Grashof.

Publication Info. Groningen : European Law Publishing, [2016]
©2016

Item Status

Description 1 online resource (324 pages).
Physical Medium polychrome
Description text file
Series European Administrative Law
European Administrative Law.
Bibliography Includes bibliographical references and index.
Contents National Procedural Autonomy Revisited. Consequences of Differences in National Administrative Litigation Rules for the Enforcement of European Union Environmental Law -- The Case of the EIA Directive by Dr. Franziska Grashof; Acknowledgements; Contents; Abbreviations; Introduction; Part I. Uniform Rules: The EIA Procedure of the Union; Part II. Fragmented Enforcement: National Rules in EIA Cases; Part III. Beyond National Procedural Autonomy?; Hypothetical Case Study; Bibliography; Online Sources; Table of Cases; Table of Legislation; Curriculum Vitae.
Summary "In National Procedural Autonomy Revisited, Franziska Grashof reconsiders one of the leading principles of European administrative law: the principle of national procedural autonomy. Her work shows that due to different national administrative litigation rules, common European rules are enforced in a fragmented manner. This is illustrated with the example of the judicial enforcement of Directive 2011/92/EU on environmental impact assessment for projects in the legal systems of Germany, England and the Netherlands. Under the same rule of Union law, litigants are treated procedurally unequally, there are different enforcement chances, and judges come to different conclusions not because of diverging interpretations of the law, but because of different administrative litigation rules. Subsequently, it is discussed whether it is necessary, desirable and possible to develop common rules of administrative litigation (in environmental matters) in the Union. It is argued, that by means of the instruments which are available in the Union - specifically legislation, jurisprudence, and comparative scholarship - a more precise common standard for administrative litigation (in environmental matters) should be created, so that the principle is: ubi ius europaeum, ibi remedium europaeum"--Back cover.
Local Note eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - North America
Subject Administrative procedure -- European Union countries.
Administrative procedure.
European Union countries.
International and municipal law -- European Union countries.
International and municipal law.
Environmental law -- European Union countries.
Environmental law.
Administrative courts -- European Union countries.
Administrative courts.
Judicial review of administrative acts -- European Union countries.
Judicial review of administrative acts.
Administrative remedies -- European Union countries.
Administrative remedies.
Genre/Form Electronic books.
Other Form: Print version: Grashof, Franziska. National Procedural Autonomy Revisited : Consequences of Differences in National Administrative Litigation Rules for the Enforcement of European Union Environmental Law - The Case of the EIA Directive. Groningen : Europa Law Publishing, ©2015 9789089521804
ISBN 9789089521767 (electronic book)
9089521763 (electronic book)
9789089521804
9089521801 (paperback)
9789089521804