The "Edwards issue" -- "What's past is prologue" -- John Hall and the Edwards underground river -- Judge Lucius Bunton and Sierra Club v. Babbitt -- Senate bill 1477 and the creation of the Edwards Aquifer Authority -- Sharpening the "blunt axe" of federal intervention -- Attempts by the Edwards Aquifer Authority to tackle the Edwards issue -- The Edwards Aquifer Recovery Implementation Program -- Organizing the Program -- Tackling the minimum flow issue -- Funding and allocating costs -- Reflections -- Appendix 1. Participants in the Edwards Aquifer Recovery Implementation Program -- Appendix 2. The Endangered Species Act -- Appendix 3. Texas water law -- Appendix 4. Elements of the bottom-up approach.
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Summary
Since the 1950s, competing interests for use of Edwards Aquifer resources-the primary source of water for more than two million people in south central Texas-were at war. They had tried many times to resolve their differences about how to conserve, allocate, and use the water, but had always failed. Finally, under the patient leadership of Robert Gulley, thirty-nine diverse stakeholders reached a consensus on the use of the Edwards Aquifer that balanced the needs of south central Texas for water with the needs of eight species protected by the Endangered Species Act, culminating a half century.
Local Note
eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - North America