LEADER 00000cam a2200577Ii 4500 
001    ocn925332679 
003    OCoLC 
005    20210122115846.8 
006    m     o  d         
007    cr cnu|||unuuu 
008    151016s2015    enk     ob    001 0 eng d 
019    926093267 
020    9780191063749|q(electronic book) 
020    0191063746|q(electronic book) 
020    |z9780198746782 
020    |z0198746784 
035    (OCoLC)925332679|z(OCoLC)926093267 
037    841512|bMIL 
040    N$T|beng|erda|epn|cN$T|dN$T|dCDX|dBNG|dYDXCP|dVLB|dIDEBK
       |dEBLCP|dOCLCA|dOCLCQ|dOCLCF|dWYU|dOCLCQ|dUKAHL|dOCLCQ 
049    RIDW 
050  4 N70|b.K58 2015eb 
072  7 ART|x000000|2bisacsh 
082 04 701.17|223 
090    N70|b.K58 2015eb 
100 1  Kivy, Peter,|0https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/
       n50047220|eauthor. 
245 10 De Gustibus :|barguing about taste and why we do It /
       |cPeter Kivy. 
250    First edition. 
264  1 Oxford, United Kingdom :|bOxford University Press,|c2015. 
300    1 online resource 
336    text|btxt|2rdacontent 
337    computer|bc|2rdamedia 
338    online resource|bcr|2rdacarrier 
340    |gpolychrome|2rdacc 
347    text file|2rdaft 
504    Includes bibliographical references and index. 
505 00 |tHume's Dilemma --|tA Ground Common to All --|tBeautiful 
       Versus the Good (in the Eighteenth Century) --|tSimple 
       Emotivism --|tDo So as Well --|tAesthetic Shrug --
       |tImmoral Art --|tIs Bad Taste Immoral? --|tPush-Pin and 
       Poetry --|tBack to Square One --|tRight Phenomenology? --
       |tTruth of Interpretation --|tTruth of Analysis --|tTruth 
       of Evaluation --|tCommon Sense and the Error Theory. 
520 8  In 'De Gustibus' Peter Kivy deals with a question that has
       never been fully addressed by philosophers of art: why do 
       we argue about art? We argue about the 'facts' of the 
       world either to influence people's behaviour or simply to 
       get them to see what we take to be the truth about the 
       world. We argue over ethical matters, if we are ethical 
       'realists, ' because we think we are arguing about 'facts'
       in the world. And we argue about ethics, if we are 
       'emotivists, ' or are now what are called 'expressionists,
       ' which is to say, people who think matters of ethics are 
       simply matters of 'attitude, ' to influence the behaviour 
       of others. But why should we argue about works of art? 
       There are no 'actions' we wish to motivate. Whether I 
       think Bach is greater than Beethoven and you think the 
       opposite, why should it matter to either of us to convince
       the other? This is a question that philosophers have never
       faced. Kivy claims here that we argue over taste because 
       we think, mistakenly or not, that we are arguing over 
       matters of fact. 
588 0  Online resource; title from PDF title page (EBSCO, viewed 
       October 22, 2015). 
590    eBooks on EBSCOhost|bEBSCO eBook Subscription Academic 
       Collection - North America 
650  0 Aesthetics.|0https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/
       sh85001441 
650  0 Arts|0https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85008324
       |xPhilosophy and aesthetics.|0https://id.loc.gov/
       authorities/subjects/sh2014002232 
650  7 Aesthetics.|2fast|0https://id.worldcat.org/fast/798702 
650  7 Arts.|2fast|0https://id.worldcat.org/fast/817721 
655  4 Electronic books. 
856 40 |uhttps://rider.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://
       search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&
       db=nlebk&AN=1081352|zOnline ebook via EBSCO. Access 
       restricted to current Rider University students, faculty, 
       and staff. 
856 42 |3Instructions for reading/downloading the EBSCO version 
       of this ebook|uhttp://guides.rider.edu/ebooks/ebsco 
901    MARCIVE 20231220 
948    |d20210519|cEBSCO|tEBSCOebooksAcademic 1-22-21 4032|lridw 
994    92|bRID