| Description |
1 online resource (349 pages) |
| Physical Medium |
polychrome |
| Description |
text file |
| Bibliography |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 211-336) and index. |
| Contents |
Introduction -- Market power in an era of antitrust -- Faltering political consensus supporting antitrust -- Preventing the political misuse of antitrust -- Recalibrating error costs and presumptions -- Erroneous arguments against enforcement -- Inferring agreement and algorithmic coordination -- Exclusionary conduct by dominant platforms -- Threats to innovation from lessened competition -- Harm to suppliers, workers, and platform users -- Restoring a competitive economy. |
| Summary |
In the 1970s, when the United States economy was struggling and the term "stagflation" was coined to capture inflation plus stagnant business growth, the "Chicago school" critique of antitrust rules gained ascendance. In the 1980s, during Ronald Reagan's two terms as president, that critique's policy prescriptions-the eliminating of or modifying anticompetitive rules to make them less restrictive-became common practice. As Jonathan Baker writes, "The Chicago approach to antitrust can be understood as a gamble. More relaxed antitrust rules would allow firms to achieve greater efficiencies, which would more than compensate for any risk of firms exercising market power. Put differently, the Chicagoans bet that antitrust reform could achieve long term consumer welfare gains without facilitating the creation of substantial and durable market power." The Antitrust Paradigm presents a wealth of evidence arguing that the Chicagoans lost their bet, and prescribes what should be done about it. Since the 1980s, not only has market power widened, economic productivity decline, and consumer welfare gains been modest at best, but also the economy has changed, most visibly in the information technology and Internet giants that top the financial market's valuation charts. Baker argues that both the failures of antitrust reform and the changed economy demand a new antitrust paradigm, one that restores a competitive economy through strengthened antitrust, recognizes antitrust's political context, and identifies the competitive harms from dominant information technology platforms. His book frames the problem, examines the distinctive competitive problems of the information economy, and concludes with a guide for restoring effective antitrust policies.-- Provided by publisher |
|
At a time when tech giants have amassed vast market power, Jonathan Baker shows how laws and regulations can be updated to ensure more competition. The sooner courts and antitrust enforcement agencies stop listening to the Chicago school and start paying attention to modern economics, the sooner Americans will reap the benefits of competition. |
| Local Note |
eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - North America |
| Subject |
Antitrust law -- Economic aspects -- United States.
|
|
Antitrust law -- Economic aspects. |
|
United States. |
|
Competition -- United States.
|
|
Competition. |
|
United States -- Economic policy.
|
|
United States -- Economic conditions -- 1945-
|
| Chronological Term |
1945- |
| Subject |
Economic policy. |
|
BUSINESS & ECONOMICS -- Industries -- General. |
|
Economic conditions. |
|
LAW -- Antitrust. |
|
Economic history. |
| Chronological Term |
Since 1945 |
| Other Form: |
Print version: Baker, Jonathan B. Antitrust paradigm. Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 2019 9780674975781 (DLC) 2018039448 (OCoLC)1057241829 |
| ISBN |
9780674238947 (electronic book) |
|
067423894X (electronic book) |
|
9780674238954 (epub) |
|
0674238958 (epub) |
|
9780674238961 (mobi) |
|
0674238966 (mobi) |
|
9780674975781 (hardcover) |
|
0674975782 (hardcover) |
|
