| Description |
1 online resource. |
|
text file |
| Series |
Argumentation in context,
1877-6884 ;
9
|
|
Argumentation in context ; 9.
|
| Bibliography |
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| Contents |
Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Foreword; PART I A general perspective applied to scientific controversies; Arguing in the Grooves; 1. Introduction; 2. Genre and language constraints; 2.1 Types of controversies and their resolution; 3. That woodpecker; 4. Arsenic-incorporating bacteria; 5. The hobbit; 6. Conclusion; References ; PART II Argumentation in a political context; Cultural differences in political debate; 1. Introduction; 2. The debates in context; 2.1 The 2010 British Prime Minister debates |
|
2.2 The 2012 Egyptian debate2.3 The 2012 U.S. presidential debates; 3. Theory; 4. Method; 4.1 Selection of debates and the acquisition of primary texts; 4.2 Unitizing and coding the debates; 4.3 Reliability; 5. Results; 5.1 Direct face threat; 5.2 Indirect face threat; 5.3 Attacks on character and leadership competence; 5.4 Attacks on ideas, positions, and plans; 5.5 Attacks on use of data; 6. Discussion; 7. Conclusion; The September 11, 1973 military coup in Chile and the military regime 1973-1990; 1. Introduction; 2. Framework for the study of blogs; 3. Analysis of blogs; 4. Conclusions |
|
2.3 Argumentative acts between Pragma-dialectics and ScaPoLine3. Illustrative analysis; 3.1 Confrontation Stage coded through REPORTED-DUBITATIVE SPEECH; 3.2 Confrontation & Concluding Stage through NEGATIVE + DUBITATIVE SPEECH; 3.3 Argumentation Stage through QUOTED SPEECH; 4. Concluding; References ; A pragma-dialectical approach of legal argumentation; 1. Introduction; 2. The implementation of pragmatic argumentation in legal justification as part of a stereotypical pattern of argumentation; 2.1 The argumentation on the first level of the main argumentation: Pragmatic argumentation |
|
2.2 The argumentation on the second and third level of the subordinate argumentation3. Exemplary analysis of the use of argumentation referring to consequences in light of the purpose of the rule in legal justification; 3.1 The justification of the applicability of the argumentation scheme of pragmatic argumentation; 4. Conclusion; References; Transparency in legal argumentation; 1. Introduction; 2. Administrative judicial decisions as a specific activity type; 3. Dutch administrative law procedure; 4. Administrative judicial decisions and the composite audience |
| Local Note |
eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - North America |
| Subject |
Persuasion (Rhetoric)
|
|
Persuasion (Rhetoric) |
|
Discourse analysis.
|
|
Discourse analysis. |
| Genre/Form |
Electronic books.
|
|
Electronic books.
|
| Added Author |
Eemeren, F. H. van (Frans Hendrik), 1946- editor.
|
|
Garssen, Bart, editor.
|
| Other Form: |
Print version: Scrutinizing argumentation in practice Amsterdam ; Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company, [2015] 9789027211262 (DLC) 2015025908 |
| ISBN |
9789027268082 (pdf) |
|
9027268088 (pdf) |
|
9789027211262 (hardback) (alkaline paper) |
|
9027211264 |
|
9789027211262 |
|
