Skip to content
You are not logged in |Login  
     
Limit search to available items
Record:   Prev Next
Resources
More Information
Bestseller
BestsellerE-book
Author Pernin, Christopher G., 1973-

Title Readiness reporting for a different Army / Christopher G. Pernin, Dwayne M. Butler, Louay Constant, Lily Geyer, Duncan Long, Dan Madden, John E. Peters, Jim Powers, Michael Shurkin.

Publication Info. Santa Monica, CA : RAND, [2013]
©2013

Item Status

Description 1 online resource (xxiii, 139 pages) : color illustrations.
text file PDF
Series RAND Corporation research report series ; RR230
Research report (Rand Corporation) ; RR230.
Bibliography Includes bibliographical references (pages 131-139).
Contents Introduction. -- Building new capabilities and readiness reporting. -- Exploring the value of the MTOE for readiness reporting. -- From readiness to capabilities: ready for what? -- Transitioning to the future and recommendations. -- Appendix A. Literature -- Appendix B. Selected rapid capability organizations -- Appendix C. MTOE scrubs -- Appendix D. Framework for considering root causes of assigned missions.
Summary The Army has developed an impressive capacity to adapt to emerging requirements by providing units with new capabilities rapidly and flexibly as units prepare for deployment through the Army Force Generation (ARFORGEN) process. The Army's ability to report on readiness throughout these adaptations, however, is challenged. The readiness reporting system is largely predicated on a bottom-up, deliberate process with known milestones and pre-determined designs to which the Army would build readiness. As those targets are changed, for instance when deploying to a changing operational environment as was seen in Iraq and Afghanistan, the reporting system cannot easily keep up. The key challenge to readiness reporting is that Army units now routinely prepare for assigned missions that sometimes differ in meaningful ways from their designed missions. This study examines the Army's readiness reporting system in light of the increased adaptiveness demonstrated by Army units in the past decade. In this study we found that while the readiness reporting system still works as originally intended, the current readiness reporting system captures only a portion of the adaptations readily seen in recent years. The study offers recommendations to better reflect these adaptations in the readiness reporting system.
Funding The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Army under Contract No. W74V8H-06-C-0001.
Local Note JSTOR Books at JSTOR Open Access
Language English.
Subject United States. Army -- Operational readiness -- Evaluation.
United States. Army.
Evaluation.
United States. Army -- Reorganization -- Evaluation.
Genre/Form Electronic books.
Technical reports.
Technical reports.
Added Author Arroyo Center.
Rand Corporation.
ISBN 9780833083753 (electronic book)
0833083759 (electronic book)
9780833080325
0833080326